On
the other hand, it can be argued that the role that Dulles played in
Us foreign policy was particularly effective at particular points,
and some have even claimed 'His objectives were magnificent'. An
example of his policies being successful is evident in 1955 when
Quemay and Matso were attacked by the Chinese. Dulles employs the
policy of brinksmanship which suggests that it is 'the ability to get
to the verge without getting into the war is the necessary art' and
this policy was used in this case. He hinted at the use of nuclear
weapons at this point by stating 'new and powerful weapons of
precision, which can utterly destroy military targets' would be used,
and this tactic was enough to force the Chinese to back out of
conflict, this was brinksmanship at its best and so therefore in this
case of scenario, Dulles was labelled 'triumphant'. Furthermore,
Dulles was successful in the organisation of SEATO (South East Asian
Treaty Organisation) which would be founded in order to 'defend
against aggression in the Pacific Ocean'. Althought SEATO is
generally regarded as a failure due to internal conflict and dispute
which hindered general use of the SEATO military, However
SEATO-funded
cultural and educational programs and left long-standing effects in
Southeast Asia. Although SEATO never proved to become the 'bulwark'
against communism expansion which Dulles had imagined, it had managed
to have positive and long term effects which would improve
international relations. Moreover, the pragmatic approach of Dulles
which involved pushing, compromising and backing down when necessary
was employed when dealing with the bloody Hungarian rebellion of
1956. Dulles recognised that Hungary was firmly within the Soviet
sphere of influence, and so although sympathy was expressed at the
crushing of the revolution by Eisenhower and Dulles, they
intelligently avoided intervention. This avoided provoking the
Soviet's, and possibly sparking the fire's of WWIII. This was
possible because Eisenhower and Dulles were both highly religious and
republican's, and so their hard line approach towards communism was
never questioned. In conclusion, these factors combined all suggest
that the tactics employed by Dulles at certain points during his time
as Secretary of State were influential and did derive positive
results in hindsight.
No comments:
Post a Comment